VMAP-1.0-repeatafter-conflict
repeatAfter has no effect when timeOffset is `"start"` or `"end"` — those positions occur once per playback
Short answer
The repeatAfter attribute only makes sense for mid-roll positions defined by a timecode or percentage. When timeOffset is start or end, the break occurs exactly once per playback and repeatAfter is meaningless.
Why this matters in production
This rule is a strong risk signal. Tags with this issue often still parse, but they become brittle across SDKs, SSAI resolvers, and CTV environments. VMAP rules validate the ad break schedule envelope. Malformed break timing, wrong namespace declarations, or invalid AdSource content prevent players from resolving any of the ads in the playlist. Affected scope: VMAP 1.0 (all VMAP documents).
VMAP-1.0-repeatafter-conflict and other issues instantly.Open the VAST tag validator →